Banner Blog: Where banners click
We're looking for a sponsor or advertisers
AboutIndustry NewsSubmitArchives and RSSSubscribeContactFollow us on TwitterJoin us on Facebook
View the complete news archive here

April 14, 2010

Twitter gets a revenue stream

So unless you've been living under a large rock (with no wifi), you'll have read that Twitter has announced that businesses can now purchase "promoted tweets" - tweets that will appear as part of the results page when users search. It seems like a pretty smart, user-focused move and one that a lot of folks will be watching super closely. They claim that any tweets that don't resonate well with the audience (ie. get retweeted) will disappear. They also say that users will only be subject to one promoted tweet per results page. It's the second big ad model announced this week (following up after Apple's in-app iAd framework from yesterday). How will it all go? Who knows? But it's all verrry interesting to watch. Does it mean users who never search will not ever see promotional tweets? (How many times does the average user search Twitter?) What's going to be the first creative use of promoted tweets? Will Justin Beiber ever stop being a trending topic? Lots of questions ahead.


Update from Ashley: I saw this announced at the Ad Age Digital conference and a few more details. There was a lot of Twitter activity when it was being discussed

1: It's being tested with search just to iron out initial kinks. It will then be rolled out to more areas
2: No mention of pricing model
3: No real mention of location or geo-targetting
4: CPM model initially
5: Ads will be given a "resonance" score and this score will determine if your tweet will continue to be promoted
6: Launch partners are Virgin America (launching a new route through it exclusively), Bravo and it seems Starbucks.
7: Revenue sharing for publishers and apps (like Tweetdeck, Hootsuite, Seesmic) and some more details revealed tomorrow at a developers conference
8: You will be able to promote multiple Tweets and the system will automatically pick the one with the best resonance.
9: Resonance will NOT be available for general tweets just for promoted ones you paid for. This seems like a real lost opportunity.

It looks like Google Adwords 1.0 right now

April 13, 2010

Apple iAds

Steve Jobs goes through an example of a new iAd, Apple's new platform for in-app advertising.

February 19, 2010

A word on the Digital Hot & Cold index

We've received an overwhelmingly positive response to the inaugural Campaign Brief / Bannerblog Digital Hot & Cold Index. We thank everyone for participating and we believe the response from the creative community has demonstrated the value in an index of this kind.

We always expected an index of this type to generate debate, however we wish to set the record straight regarding its purpose.

The index is not a precursor to a new world order.

For anyone to suggest the index is an audit of the digital agency landscape is grossly inaccurate and misleading. The index was only ever intended to be one measure of our industry's output - its creative product.

It has never been positioned as a definitive ranking of the industry and it joins a long list of other industry rankings created for their own purpose and audience.

The index's intended audience was always the Australia & New Zealand creative community - both traditional & digital. That should be obvious by the association with Campaign Brief which has enjoyed considerable success & continued agency participation in its annual Hot & Cold survey.

The critics of this process have had ample time to air their views & shape the debate over how a Hot & Cold index would be formulated.

In November 2009 we emailed the Creative Social mailing list, the Australian chapter of a global digital community made up mostly of CDs and the occasional MD, stating the intention to produce a Hot & Cold Index. Debate ensued. We also discussed it in Creative Social gatherings on at least two occasions. Sixteen people put their name forward to judge and these names were circulated on the Creative Social mailing list for feedback.

The judging short list included representatives from the following agencies : The Hallway, Pusher, The White Agency, Leo Burnett, Clemenger (x2), Reactive, Holler, Soap, Host, Tongue, Tribal DD, Publicis Mojo, Bullsye, The Furnance & Tequila.

The above list included representatives from two agencies that didn't submit an agency entry. Host & The White Agency.

The final judging panel of eight was selected by pulling names from a hat. This list of judges can be seen here.

We believe the process leading to the formation of the Hot & Cold index allowed everyone who wanted to input on the index, ample opportunity to do so.

We believe the level of participation in the index from the creative community validates its format.

The index represents a substantial cross section of the AU / NZ digital creative community and as long as the index continues to find an audience we'll continue to produce it. If there isn't an audience, or the audience believes the index is flawed then it simply won't survive and the industry will move on to the next one.

Based on the feedback we've received over the past few days, we expect to see even greater participation in the next round. Agencies that have communicated their intent to participate in the next index include Ogilvy, @www, Droga5, GladEye & Colenso BBDO.

Ashadi Hopper &
The Bannerblog Team

Note : Comments above were echoed to the Creative Social mailing list earlier this week.

February 16, 2010

Australia/NZ Digital Agency Index: Campaign Brief and Bannerblog


Australia & NZ Digital Agency Index

The Official Hot + Cold Agency list for Digital Agencies in Australia & NZ

Presented by Campaign Brief and Bannerblog.

Get Adobe Flash player

Well the first Digital Hot+Cold is over and no one can say it wasn't a democratic process. Agency inclusion, judging criteria, the jury and even the way it will be displayed was shaped over many (read: MANY!) emails between the 20+ agencies involved in Creative Social.

Update Feb 18: We've made a tweak to the list and we now present the Digital Hot List. Showcasing only the hottest digital agencies in Australia.

Three agencies who didn't enter are also in this list. Sapient Nitro, Bullseye and Tribal DDB Sydney. If you are from these agencies and would like to be removed contact us.

It's surprising there has never been a wide spread audit of the agencies doing digital in Australia. This list will educate, anger, surprise and hopefully generate friendly rivalry and discussion between agencies.

The agencies were judged across 3 criteria;

  • Awards: 10% (self explanatory)
  • Name: 5% (Does the agency look after its own brand) and
  • Work 85% (Based on purely the creative).
  • The criteria for "Technical" will be added next round to allow the chart to be viewed by creativity and technical separately.
  • Size was determined by number of full time staff.

It was important for the jury to compare apples to apples, so all agencies are separated into 3 subgroups, Full Service, Digital Agency and Digital Production, to reflect the nature of the digital side. We also added the Indie marker to show who is independently owned.

There is little doubt this list will cause debate but that will only prove how important the list is. It is the most detailed analysis of the landscape of digital creativity in Australia & NZ today. We hope to see more agencies submit entries in the next round especially those from QLD, SA and WA oh and NZ.

Note: The following agencies asked not to be included: Amnesia, HOST, Webqem, Deepend, The White Agency. If you are wondering where they are that's your answer.

Of the 50+ agencies listed here 34 entered. As this is the first year and less established than the Campaign Brief agency rankings we feel this is a good result.
Full Service agencies have fought back over the past year to command a large stack in the rankings.
Very few agencies have >50 staff with even less >75.
Visual Jazz is the largest "Digital Agency" at 98 people.
MARK is the largest full service with 98 people in their digital department.
No one is super hot! The last 2 hot bars are still empty.
This digital list looks the opposite of the ATL agency list.
Youngest Agency is Future Buro.
Smallest is Droga5 at 3 people.

Missing Agencies:
We made every effort to ensure we got this first round of the list right but we have missed a few agencies.

The following agencies have been noted as missing;

  1. Ogilvy
  2. Areeba
  3. Lemonade
  4. Citrus
  5. Lowe Rivet
  6. Three Drunk Monkeys
  7. @www
  8. Freestyle Media
  9. Igloo
  10. OneDigital

We'll be looking at doing another induction round in <3 months. This will cover any mistakes and also allow the abstaining agencies to put forward their entries. We'll also attempt to introduce the "technical" aspect into the rankings to allow agencies to be ranked via creative or technical.

The Breakdown
Here is a breakdown of the agencies and the scores as of Feb 2010.

Agency Name Score Size Agency Type Indie
Soap 79 34 Digital Agency Yes
Resn 76 13 Digital Production Yes
AIM Proximity 74 55 Full Service  
Tribal DDB NZ 72 23 Full Service  
Tequila 71 38 Full Service  
Holler 68 27 Digital Agency  
Clemenger BBDO Vic 67 20 Full Service  
Mojo 67 65 Full Service  
Pusher 67 9 Digital Agency Yes
MARK 66 98 Full Service  
Droga5 63 3 Full Service  
JWT 62 36 Full Service  
Clemenger BBDO NSW 61 45 Full Service  
Visual Jazz 59 98 Digital Agency  
Boffswana 57 11 Digital Production  
Saatchi & Saatchi DGS 57 23 Full Service  
Wasabi 57 9 Digital Production Yes
Leo Burnett 56 18 Full Service  
Design Royale 55 8 Digital Production Yes
BMF 54 30 Full Service  
Profero 53 27 Digital Agency Yes
Sapient Nitro 53 15 Full Service  
Circul8 52 9 Digital Agency Yes
Tongue 52 42 Full Service  
Bullseye 51 35 Digital Agency  
Future Buro 51 6 Digital Production Yes
Reactive 51 46 Digital Agency Yes
DT Digital 50 67 Digital Production  
Sputnik 50 74 Digital Agency  
Tribal DDB Vic 50 29 Full Service  
Tribal DDB SYD 50 40 Full Service  

The Jury
The 8 judges were picked from a hat from a pool of 22 and come from both small digital agencies and large multi nationals.

Matt Stern: CD Profero
Damian Royce: CD CLEMENGER BBDO Melbourne
Paul Jeffress: Group Creative Head: The White Agency
Tim Buesing: CD Holler
Lyndon Hale: ECD: Tongue
Mike Crebar: CD Pusher
Joel Thomson: CD Digital Publicis Mojo
Kevin Ferry: CD Bullseye

Some quotes from the judges below

Joel Thomson, the Creative Director of Digital at Publicis Mojo, said
"I'm certain it's exactly what clients are searching for; some sound direction in choosing the right agencies to partner with. We wanted to see work that had more relevance in the real world, than the award world alone; the hot agencies were hot for the right reasons."

Tim Buesing CD of Holler said
"It was really important to focus on 2009 and not be influenced by how cold or hot you thought some agencies were in 2008. Some of the traditionally "hot" places have definitely cooled off a bit."

Kevin Ferry CD Bullseye said
"The playground has now become much more competitive from the bigger shops and more specialist boutiques gaining a foothold in the online space. Interesting to see how it will shape up in the coming months."

Damian Royce CD of Clemenger BBDO said
"With the line between agency and digital agency well and truly blurred, it's great to see who was doing the best (and most awarded) digital work in 2009. Some of the usual suspects are up there, but more interestingly we can see a few agencies that aren't widely known for producing great digital ideas sitting at the warmer end of the index. Of course, that could all change again next near."

Please comment below on your thoughts for this index.

This process is evolving so don't expect to see the criteria/structure stay the same.

If you would like to be included in the next round please email us at submit [@] bannerblog[]com[]au

February 13, 2010


CRAPADS is a new viral campaign promoting Rich Media from Pointroll. I'm guessing pointroll as they are the only company mentioned vaguely on the site.

Execution it's well done but isn't this preaching to the converted? If you have a spare 7 minutes (who doesn't!) check out the video.

Do you think a campaign like this is worthwhile. I have become a hater of unbranded "virals" these days and think even if Pointroll are responsible for it no one will know or care.

Campaign found via Adrants.

When doing a pastiche of those old training videos you can't go past Ben Stiller's Red Hour Films video.

In local banner ad news there is a push to raise the standard banner file size from 30-40k to 100k. Clemenger BBDO Sydney will be running a test with a client and Hall and Partners are setting up a research/testing framework to run a proper study on the differences in brand recall, purchase intent, CTR and other factors between a 40k and a 100k banner. Firfaix and Eyeblaster locally will support with the media serving.

We'll keep you posted on how this progressing. If Australia was to adopt this larger size as default it would put us ahead of the entire world. So we'll be known for that and Russell Crowe.

Previous Page Next Page