Yawn! Yawn! Yawn! Yawn!
I woudln't mind so much if it didn;t feel so cheap and nasty.
Posted by:Ashley on May 16, 2006 8:48 PM
it also wound't be so bad if the arrows actually looked like proper mouse arrows and if you could actually read the copy that sits under the logo!?
I join Ashley in his yawning!!
Posted by:will on May 17, 2006 2:06 AM
I hate this so much it makes me want to carve my own eyes out.
Not only is the production quality absolute rubbish, it's also merely a lame product demonstration wrapped in an even lamer mouse gag.
And this made the One Show shortlist? Is this 1995? No wonder creatives who work in other media are laughing at us.
Posted by:MC on May 17, 2006 11:45 AM
Iritating cheap lame. Grrrrrr.
Posted by:Todd on May 18, 2006 1:59 AM
simple is good , don't you think sometimes?
Posted by: on May 21, 2006 3:38 AM
i'm not into the concept or execution on this. design seems cheap and low quality, the interaction bit is low end.
Posted by:eric powell on May 31, 2006 10:48 AM
Yawn! Yawn! Yawn! Yawn!
I woudln't mind so much if it didn;t feel so cheap and nasty.
Posted by:Ashley on May 16, 2006 8:48 PM
it also wound't be so bad if the arrows actually looked like proper mouse arrows and if you could actually read the copy that sits under the logo!?
I join Ashley in his yawning!!
Posted by:will on May 17, 2006 2:06 AM
I hate this so much it makes me want to carve my own eyes out.
Not only is the production quality absolute rubbish, it's also merely a lame product demonstration wrapped in an even lamer mouse gag.
And this made the One Show shortlist? Is this 1995?
No wonder creatives who work in other media are laughing at us.
Posted by:MC on May 17, 2006 11:45 AM
Iritating cheap lame. Grrrrrr.
Posted by:Todd on May 18, 2006 1:59 AM
simple is good , don't you think sometimes?
Posted by: on May 21, 2006 3:38 AM
i'm not into the concept or execution on this. design seems cheap and low quality, the interaction bit is low end.
Posted by:eric powell on May 31, 2006 10:48 AM
