If the fastest 10k is 26'49", then surely the fastes 5k would be less than 13'30". Wouldn't it? Seeing how half of 26'49" is 13'25"ish.
Posted by:charley on October 12, 2007 8:50 PM
I'm guessing the person pulled their finger out for the last 5km? Or their power song really did make a difference.
Posted by:Ashley on October 14, 2007 9:15 PM
Typically people running 5 and 10K's that fast aren't wearing iPods anyway.
Its aspirational though, and as most Nike work extremely well executed. I like it.
Posted by:Bruce on November 20, 2007 9:02 AM
If the fastest 10k is 26'49", then surely the fastes 5k would be less than 13'30". Wouldn't it? Seeing how half of 26'49" is 13'25"ish.
Posted by:charley on October 12, 2007 8:50 PM
I'm guessing the person pulled their finger out for the last 5km? Or their power song really did make a difference.
Posted by:Ashley on October 14, 2007 9:15 PM
Typically people running 5 and 10K's that fast aren't wearing iPods anyway.
Its aspirational though, and as most Nike work extremely well executed.
I like it.
Posted by:Bruce on November 20, 2007 9:02 AM
